The Consultation Models
Physical, Psychological and Social (1972)
The RCGP model encourages the doctor to extend his thinking practice beyond the purely organic approach to patients, i.e., to include the patientâs emotional, family, social, and environmental circumstances.
Stott and Davis (1979)
âThe exceptional potential in each primary care consultationâ suggests that four areas can be systematically explored each time a patient consults.
- Management of presenting problems
- Modification of help-seeking behaviors
- Management of continuing problems
- Opportunistic health promotion
Byrne and Long (1976)
âDoctors talking to patientsâ. Six phases which form a logical structure to the consultation:
-
Phase I
The doctor establishes a relationship with the patient. -
Phase II
The doctor either attempts to discover or actually discovers the reason for the patientâs attendance. -
Phase III
The doctor conducts a verbal or physical examination or both. -
Phase IV
The doctor, or the doctor and the patient, or the patient (in that order of probability) consider the condition. -
Phase V
The doctor, and occasionally the patient, detail further treatment or further investigation. -
Phase VI
The consultation is terminated usually by the doctor.
Helmanâs âFolk Modelâ (1981)
Cecil Helman is a Medical Anthropologist, with constantly enlightening insights into the cultural factors in health and illness. He suggests that a patient with a problem comes to a doctor seeking answers to six questions:
- What has happened?
- Why has it happened?
- Why to me?
- Why now?
- What would happen if nothing was done about it?
- What should I do about it or whom should I consult for further help?
Transactional Analysis (1964)
- Many doctors will be familiar with Eric Berneâs model of the human psyche as consisting of three âego-statesâ - Parent, Adult, and Child.
- At any given moment each of us is in a state of mind when we think, feel, behave, react, and have attitudes as if we were either a critical or caring Parent, a logical Adult, or a spontaneous or dependent Child.
- Many general practice consultations are conducted between a Parental doctor and a Child-like patient.
- This transaction is not always in the best interests of either party, and a familiarity with TA introduces a welcome flexibility into the doctorâs repertoire which can break out of the repetitious cycles of behavior (âgamesâ) into which some consultations can degenerate.
Pendleton, Schofield, Tate and Havelock (1984, 2003)
âThe Consultation - An Approach to Learning and Teachingâ describe seven tasks which taken together form comprehensive and coherent aims for any consultation.
-
To define the reason for the patientâs attendance, including:
- i) the nature and history of the problems
- ii) their aetiology
- iii) the patientâs ideas,
- iv) the effects of the problems
-
To consider other problems:
- i) continuing problems
-
With the patient, to choose an appropriate action for each problem.
-
To achieve a shared understanding of the problems with the patient.
-
To involve the patient in the management and encourage him to accept appropriate responsibility.
-
To use time and resources appropriately:
- i) in the consultation
- ii) in the long term
Neighbour (1987)
Five check points: âwhere shall we make for next and how shall we get there?â
-
Connecting
Establishing rapport with the patient. -
Summarizing
Getting to the point of why the patient has come using eliciting skills to discover their ideas, concerns, expectations and summarizing back to the patient. -
Handing over
Doctorsâ and patientsâ agendas are agreed. Negotiating, influencing, and gift wrapping. -
Safety netting
What if?: consider what the doctor might do in each case. -
Housekeeping
Am I in good enough shape for the next patient?
Abridged Calgary-Cambridge Guide
Task 1: Initiating the Session
Establishing initial rapport
- Greets patient and obtains patientâs name
- Introduces self, role, and nature of interview; obtains consent if necessary
Identifying the reason(s) for the consultation
3. Identifies the patientâs problems or the issues that the patient wishes to address (e.g., âWhat problems brought you to the hospital?â or âWhat would you like to discuss today?â or âWhat questions did you hope to get answered today?â)
Task 2: Gathering Information
- Exploration of patientâs problems
- Discover the biomedical perspective, patientâs perspective, and the background information 4. Uses open and closed questioning technique, moving from open to closed 5. Listens attentively, allowing patient to complete statements without interruption and leaving space for patient to think before answering or go on after pausing 6. Facilitates patientâs responses verbally and nonâverbally e.g., use of encouragement, silence, repetition, paraphrasing, interpretation
Task 3: Providing Structure
- Summarizes at the end of a specific line of enquiry
- Attends to timing and keeping interview on task
Task 4: Building Relationship
-
Using appropriate non-verbal behavior 9. Demonstrates appropriate nonâverbal behavior. Eye contact, facial expression, posture, vocal cues e.g., rate, volume, tone
-
Developing rapport 10. Uses empathy to communicate understanding and appreciation of the patientâs feelings or predicament; overtly acknowledges patientâs views and feelings
Task 5: Closing the Session
-
Forward planning 11. Safety nets, explaining possible unexpected outcomes, what to do if plan is not working, when and how to seek help
-
Ensuring appropriate point of closure 12. Final check that patient agrees and is comfortable with plan and asks if any corrections, questions, or other items to discuss.
Task 6: Explanation and Planning
Providing the correct amount and type of information
- 13. Chunks and checks: gives information in manageable chunks, checks for understanding, uses patientâs response as a guide to how to proceed
Aiding accurate recall and understanding
- 14. Organizes explanation: divides into sections, develops a logical sequence
Achieving a shared understanding: incorporating the patientâs perspective
- 15. Provides opportunities and encourages patient to contribute
Planning: shared decision making
- 16. Involves patient by making suggestions and checks if patient accepts plans.